Concerns Raised of Flood Risk from Grove Park Development
Residents' group claims council considering reclassification of Hartington Road site
Developer's visualisation of the houses. Picture: Pilbrow and Partners
A group of Grove Park residents is raising concerns that a planned development by the river may be increasing the flood risk in the area.
Residence One (Hartington) Ltd has submitted a planning application to build 4 houses in the back garden of 17 Hartington Road. The application site covers an area of 2,750m2 including what is described as the largest garden in Grove Park which runs all the way down to the river.
The Environment Agency has formally objected to the development saying, “The development falls within a flood risk vulnerability category that is inappropriate to the Flood Zone in which the application site is located. The application is therefore contrary to the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) and its associated planning practice guidance (PPG). We recommend that planning permission is refused on this basis.
The PPG classifies development types according to their vulnerability to flood risk and provides guidance on which developments are appropriate within each Flood Zone. The West London Strategic Flood Risk Assessment shows the Hartington Road site to be located within Flood Zone 3b (functional floodplain), which is defined by the PPG as land where water has to flow or be stored in times of flood.
The Environment Agency concludes, "Residential development is classed as more vulnerable and is not compatible with this Flood Zone and therefore should not be permitted.”
Map showing flood risk designation in the area
However, according to the NoGardenGrab group which describes itself as an association of over 200 local residents opposed to the development, the Hounslow Council planning department has asked its flood consultants to review the Flood Zone 3b designation for the garden on Hartington Road. The group says that planners have told them that they believe if the designation could be changed there would be no reason why the application couldn't be approved.
NoGardenGrab says in a statement, "This is extremely worrying. Surely, any attempt to change the flood zone designation should not be conducted under a cloak of secrecy? It needs to be fully transparent and independent of planning decisions. You should not seek to change the rules just because they are not convenient for developers. The implications are serious and far reaching for future owners of the proposed new homes as well as for neighbouring residents whose lives and property may be put at risk. We would like to see the information being used to review the flood risk designation put in the public domain so that we can all understand how the decisions are to be reached and have an opportunity to respond. So far our requests for transparency have been ignored."
The view of the end of the garden from the river as it is now
The group points out that the Environment Agency's categorical objection to the application would not be known about by most residents as it is not the borough's policy to publish comments made. The council says this is due to concerns about breaching GDPR but this would not apply to responses from a government body and the Environment Agency has said that it would like to see its comments in the public domain. However, NoGardenGrab believes the lack of dissenting comment or even independent analysis means that there is a 'dangerous bias' in favour of developers over the environment and local residents.
The aerial image shows the length of the garden to the river and proximity with Chiswick Staithe
The application has attracted numerous other objections about loss of trees, damage to biodiversity, inappropriate design and ongoing neglect of the main house.
The planning reference is P/2021/2827. You can make comment online at www.hounslow.gov.uk/planning or email planning@hounslow.gov.uk.
For further information about the campaign against the proposal email:nogardengrab@gmail.com.
Like Reading Articles Like This? Help Us Produce More This site remains committed to providing local community news and public interest journalism. Articles such as the one above are integral to what we do. We aim to feature as much as possible on local societies, charities based in the area, fundraising efforts by residents, community-based initiatives and even helping people find missing pets. We've always done that and won't be changing, in fact we'd like to do more. However, the readership that these stories generates is often below that needed to cover the cost of producing them. Our financial resources are limited and the local media environment is intensely competitive so there is a constraint on what we can do. We are therefore asking our readers to consider offering financial support to these efforts. Any money given will help support community and public interest news and the expansion of our coverage in this area. A suggested monthly payment is £8 but we would be grateful for any amount for instance if you think this site offers the equivalent value of a subscription to a daily printed newspaper you may wish to consider £20 per month. If neither of these amounts is suitable for you then contact info@neighbournet.com and we can set up an alternative. All payments are made through a secure web site. One-off donations are also appreciated. Choose The Amount You Wish To Contribute. If you do support us in this way we'd be interested to hear what kind of articles you would like to see more of on the site – send your suggestions to the editor. For businesses we offer the chance to be a corporate sponsor of community content on the site. For £30 plus VAT per month you will be the designated sponsor of at least one article a month with your logo appearing if supplied. If there is a specific community group or initiative you'd like to support we can make sure your sponsorship is featured on related content for a one off payment of £50 plus VAT. All payments are made through a secure web site. |
November 14, 2021
