Mayor Backs Council on Refusal of 13-Storey Chiswick Tower

Development would have included 204 co-living units on Power Road

artists impression of power road co living site

Related Links

Covid-19 Implications for Planning Law and Policy in England

Council Set To Refuse Permission for 13 Storey Tower

Mayor Intervenes in Power Road Tower Block Application

Participate

Sign up for our weekly Chiswick newsletter

Comment on this story on the

Concerns that the Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan may overturn Hounslow Council’s refusal of an application to build a 13 storey tower block in Chiswick have proven to be unfounded.

The scheme on the corner of Power Road and Gunnersbury Avenue was for a co-living development which would have delivered over 200 co-living housing units and some residents were worried that the Mayor’s desire to increase housing stock would have trumped other reservations about the scheme.

However a letter recently sent by Jules Pipe, the Deputy Mayor for Planning to Hounslow planning officers states, “The Mayor has delegated his planning powers to me. Having now considered a report on this case (GLA ref: GLA/6543/02, copy enclosed), I am content to allow the local planning

authority to determine the case itself, subject to any action that the Secretary of State may take, and do not therefore wish to take over the application for my own determination.”

The applicant was Tiger Developments Ltd. and the architect ArchitecturePLB. They wanted permission to demolish the existing building at 250 Gunnersbury Avenue and build a mixed-use part 11, part 12 and part 13 storey building comprising light industrial flexible workspace, a cafe and 204 co-living units with associated communal shared space.

Gunnersbury Avenue Twoer Block
The site to be developed at 250 Gunnersbury Avenue

Co-living is a concept similar to university accommodation but for graduates and urban professionals wanting affordable accommodation and convenient on site services.

The officer from the council concluded that the plan failed to provide a mix of housing that complies with the identified need for the Borough and that what was proposed was not of an acceptable standard and lacked a sufficient affordable component. It was also felt the scheme compromised the objectives of the Locally Significant Industrial Site and would have caused harm to the character and appearance of the Strand-on-the-Green, Gunnersbury Park and Thorney Hedge Conservation Areas.

The Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan had advised Hounslow Council of similar concerns about the proposal earlier this year but had suggested remedial action that could be taken to deal with these deficiencies.

The existing building has been vacant since November 2014 when the previous tenant departed. Attempts to lease the property or progress a viable commercial redevelopment have failed.

In 2010 an application requested that the existing building at be demolished and replaced by a six storey office building with ground and basement levels set aside for a car showroom. Permission for an 8-storey office building at the site is still live but has not been implemented.

The Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan had advised Hounslow Council of his concerns about the proposal earlier this year. He said that the scheme did not comply with the London Plan but suggested remedial action that could be taken to deal with these deficiencies.

The existing building has been vacant since November 2014 when the previous tenant departed. Attempts to lease the property or progress a viable commercial redevelopment have failed, meaning the site has been left unutilised. In 2010 an application requested that the existing building at be demolished and replaced by a six storey office building with ground and basement levels set aside for a car showroom. The plans failed to be implemented. Permission for an 8-storey office building at the site is still live but has not been implemented.

Like Reading Articles Like This? Help Us Produce More

This site remains committed to providing local community news and public interest journalism.

Articles such as the one above are integral to what we do. We aim to feature as much as possible on local societies, charities based in the area, fundraising efforts by residents, community-based initiatives and even helping people find missing pets.

We’ve always done that and won’t be changing, in fact we’d like to do more.

However, the readership that these stories generates is often below that needed to cover the cost of producing them. Our financial resources are limited and the local media environment is intensely competitive so there is a constraint on what we can do.

We are therefore asking our readers to consider offering financial support to these efforts. Any money given will help support community and public interest news and the expansion of our coverage in this area.

A suggested monthly payment is £8 but we would be grateful for any amount for instance if you think this site offers the equivalent value of a subscription to a daily printed newspaper you may wish to consider £20 per month. If neither of these amounts is suitable for you then contact info@neighbournet.com and we can set up an alternative. All payments are made through a secure web site.

One-off donations are also appreciated. Choose The Amount You Wish To Contribute.

If you do support us in this way we’d be interested to hear what kind of articles you would like to see more of on the site – send your suggestions to the editor.

For businesses we offer the chance to be a corporate sponsor of community content on the site. For £30 plus VAT per month you will be the designated sponsor of at least one article a month with your logo appearing if supplied. If there is a specific community group or initiative you’d like to support we can make sure your sponsorship is featured on related content for a one off payment of £50 plus VAT. All payments are made through a secure web site.

 

October 25, 2020


Bookmark and Share