THE
CHISWICKW4.COM
CHATT SESSION
|
New
leader John Chatt
|
The
Leader of Hounslow Council, Councillor John
Chatt has kindly agreed to answer a series
of Chiswick related questions from local residents.
The response to this was massive and for reasons
of space many questions are an amalgamation
of queries from different individuals. Thank
you to every one who sent in questions and
apologies if your subject was not addressed.
1.
Does Councillor Chatt feel that it is fair
that Chiswick pays higher parking charges than
the rest of the borough?
2.
What is the Council doing to secure sustainable
and sympathetic regeneration of West Chiswick?
3.
Has there being a softening of Hounslow Council's
line on the expansion of Heathrow and would
a Third Runway ever be acceptable to the current
administration?
4.
What plans has the Council to help St. Mary's
Convent Nursing Home stave off closure?
5.
Do you feel that the handling of the changes
at Chiswick Lane junction devalued any sense
of a community's right to decide issues of
importance to itself?
6.
Are you alarmed that Chiswick is one of the
few places in London which is seeing worsening
air pollution, and would you accept that this
could be partly due to the policy of discouraging
the flow of car traffic in favour of buses?
7.
Will the Council proceed with the current plans
for the library despite the objections of the
Friends of Chiswick Library?
8.
Can Cllr Chatt confirm how much money is available
through s106 as a result of the development
of Chiswick Park, whether it is accruing interest
and what he would like to see it spent on?
9.
Do you share the concerns of some people that
the Grove Park School case is an early indication
that in the next few years Chiswick will have
more children than available primary school
places?
10.
When is the last time that you visited Dukes
Meadows? Do you feel this area reflects well
on the Council's/CIP's ability to maintain
open spaces?
11.
What lobbying is the Council currently doing
to persuade London Underground to stop at Turnham
Green?
12.
How do you reassure Chiswick residents that
their views will be adequately represented
on an Executive on which no members are from
local wards or even live or work in this area?
13.
Will we have Christmas lights in Chiswick this
year?
14.
When will the underside of the railway bridge
on Turnham Green Terrace be cleaned?
1.
Does Councillor Chatt feel that it is fair
that Chiswick pays higher parking charges than
the rest of the borough?
I
am aware that there are concerns about the
different charges for residents parking in
different parts of the borough. One of the
reasons is that different parts of the Borough
clearly have different characteristics. In
the east of the Hounslow, parking demand is
extremely high with only limited on and off-street
provision. Generally the pressure on parking
decreases further westwards in the Borough.
Public transport accessibility also is generally
better in the east of the Borough and poorer
in the west, for example there are more buses
to Central London, and neighbouring areas.
For
these reasons, the Council has agreed that
differential charges are maintained in the
Borough with higher charges in the east and
lower charges in the west. However when the
charges were reviewed in April 1999, the Council
raised the charge in the west of the Borough
but agreed that the charges in the east should
remain unchanged for a period of 2 years. In
the review of charges implemented last year,
the permit prices in the Chiswick area were
reduced by £5 with other charges remaining
unchanged and there are regular reviews of
charges.
Also,
the £70 charge for Chiswick works out
as £1.35/week to be able to park close
to your property, one of the reasons that so
many people are in favour of CPZs when schemes
are proposed. In other parts of the Borough,
funds have been available to meet the full
costs of establishing parking schemes. However,
in the Chiswick area, there have only been
limited funds available to establish the parking
schemes that have been set up in East Chiswick,
Bedford Park, Mid-Chiswick and Central Chiswick.
The schemes have therefore been reliant on
the income from permits and other charges to
cover the balance of implementation costs.
Back
to top
2.
What is the Council doing to secure sustainable
and sympathetic regeneration of West Chiswick?
There
are two issues I need to address in response
to this question; the UDP of the Council and
the future plans for the West Chiswick Area.
In
terms of UDP, the Council has to give equal
consideration to social, economic and environmental
issues in all decision making whilst minimising
adverse impacts. Much of the UDP relates to
the use of brownfield land for new developments,
and to encourage a pattern of land use that
utilises current facilities, including the
provision of transport, which minimises the
harm to the environment.
In
West Chiswick this explains the reasoning behind
the approval of the 'son-of-citadel' development.
Planning
permission was refused recently for redevelopment
of the John Bull site for office development,
because, I understand amongst other things,
of the loss of a building of Local Townscape
Character and unsympathetic scale of development.
This shows that our Planning Committees are
taking note of local opinion.
Also,
the high rise Chiswick West development is,
I understand, still being considered following
extensive consultation with local residents.
For the planning officers and Councillors on
the Chiswick Planning Committee, and the Sustainable
Development Committee, the response from local
residents is very valuable and the concerns
expressed by residents are fully recognised.
However
the Chiswick West applicant has been advised
that the proposals clearly depart from policies
in the Council's Unitary Development Plan.
It would only be possible to consider granting
planning permission if it can be demonstrated
that there are exceptional circumstances that
would justify any departure from the Council's
adopted policies. However I am not aware of
any exceptional circumstances that would warrant
approval, though I am not on the Planning Committee.
For
the future, the Council is proposing to designate
much of West Chiswick as a Conservation Area
as part of an urban design/Conservation regeneration
strategy for Chiswick, subject to the outcome
of public consultation. It could be that the
designation could place early in 2003.
Back
to top
3.
Has there being a softening of Hounslow Council's
line on the expansion of Heathrow and would
a Third Runway ever be acceptable to the current
administration?
No,
not at all. There has been no change of policy
regarding the borough's position on any proposed
third runway at Heathrow. We are against it.
Though
there hasn't been any application to build
a third runway, I have taken advice from Officers
about the possibility. They suggest that expansion
of this nature is not sustainable.
The
reasons for this are clear:
" A new runway could add 230,000 aircraft
movement and 30 million passengers per annum,
putting an incredible extra strain on current
transport links.
" Air quality levels currently unacceptable
and additional passenger throughput in relation
to T5 is likely to make situation worse. Future
runway would make this even worse.
It is well known that I worked at Heathrow,
but that doesn't mean that I agreed with all
of BAA's proposals. As a trade union representative
and negotiator I often challenged them on many
issues. Likewise as a West Area Councillor
many of my constituents work at Heathrow, but
that doesn't mean that they would favour a
third runway.
Back
to top
4. What plans has
the Council to help St. Mary's Convent Nursing
Home stave off closure?
Whilst
we can understand the problems that St Mary's
is having we are unable to get involved financially,
especially as we ourselves must conform to
new rules in this area. I have seen and heard
about the fund-raising initiatives for St Mary's
and I am very impressed with the community
effort to help raise the vast amount needed.
However,
I know St Mary's well after working with them
on a number of building and planning issues
in the past, both as Mayor in 1990 and Leader,
and I have followed the activities of the home
since. Once when I visited St Mary's I was
told the many of the nuns were older than their
residents and that this could be a future problem,
however the current issue of altering buildings
to follow new guidelines is one that is ultimately
more important, and more of a threat to the
Home's future. I wish St Mary's every success
in raising the desired funds.
Back
to top
5.
Do you feel that the handling of the changes
at Chiswick Lane junction devalued any sense
of a community's right to decide issues of
importance to itself?
Well,
firstly I must apologise for the unacceptable
delay in the completion of the CLJ works, which
was partly due to a failure on our part to
manage the project as well as we could.
However
I think that the question is looking at issues
on a much bigger scale than one junction, and
at the issue of local decision making in general.
Hounslow
was one of the first Councils to introduce
local area committees, and to change the way
decisions were made on a local level, in order
to reflect the increasing importance of resident
involvement in the process. Since the May elections
our local area committees have yet more powers,
especially in relation to S106 allocations,
and the feedback from the last Chiswick Area
Committee is that Chiswick Councillors have
already influenced S106 for education in Chiswick.
However,
in some cases, other issues and policies need
to be taken into account, especially if a decision
affects more than just the local population.
In the case of the Chiswick Lane Junction it
was the Mayor's plans to improve bus services
to and from central London. There are often
bigger issues to be addressed by local committees,
not just in Chiswick but also in our other
areas, including the west area where I am a
councillor, that do mean that local opinion
needs to be balanced. Fortunately they don't
come up too often but they always seem to be
major issues when they do.
Back
to top
6. Are you alarmed that
Chiswick is one of the few places in London
which is seeing worsening air pollution, and
would you accept that this could be partly
due to the policy of discouraging the flow
of car traffic in favour of buses?
Yes,
I am alarmed, and the information I have shows
that air quality across London was generally
worse in 2001 than 2000, especially in Camden,
Kensington and Chelsea and Hounslow sites.
I know all motor vehicles emit pollution but
that emitted from buses is rapidly declining
as technological improvements are made and
the new bus fleet is introduced. We must strive
to reduce pollution from all sources but effective
use of public transport, and especially buses,
is a key, not only in relation to pollution
but also in the reduction of congestion.
We
do monitor air pollution, as you can see from
the monitoring station on the High Road, and
there are known hot spots that we keep an eye
on.
Back
to top
7.
Will the Council proceed with the current plans
for the library despite the objections of the
Friends of Chiswick Library?
No
- the Council will not be proceeding with the
current plans for Chiswick library, primarily
because they haven't addressed all of the issues
that have been raised. The proposals have been
taken back to the drawing board and they will
have to be represented at the Chiswick Area
Committee. I know that Chiswick Library is
one of the busiest in the borough, yet it is
unsuitable at the moment for local needs, especially
with government guidelines relating to computer
and internet facilities. We must be sure that
all the issues are looked at, and addressed
locally, before proceeding.
Back
to top
8.
Can Cllr Chatt confirm how much money is available
through s106 as a result of the development
of Chiswick Park, whether it is accruing interest
and what he would like to see it spent on?
At
the present time I cannot. I am informed that
the Deed of Variation is still being negotiated,
and that the amounts of S106 money available
will not be disclosed until the Deed has been
signed. A full update is scheduled to go to
Chiswick Area Committee and I would not want
to bypass the procedure in this case. The local
area committee is the place for this information
to be reported.
Back
to top
9.
Do you share the concerns of some people that
the Grove Park School case is an early indication
that in the next few years Chiswick will have
more children than available primary school
places?
I
think that the Grove Park school case actually
strengthens and increases the available school
places for local children, by re-emphasising
the importance of community schools for local
communities, and by putting local children
first for admission to their local school.
The LEA puts together a School Organisation
Plan every year which looks, amongst other
things, at the projected demand for school
places. This helps schools and the Council
to plan accordingly. It is not anticipated
that demand in the Borough will exceed the
number of places available.
Also,
the William Hogarth School will be expanding
over the next 4 years into a full Primary school,
increasing places locally.
Back
to top
10.
When is the last time that you visited Dukes
Meadows? Do you feel this area reflects well
on the Council's/CIP's ability to maintain
open spaces?
I'm
actually at Dukes Meadows quite often as I
am a member of the Civil Service Bowls Club,
and I was last there on Sunday. I am also a
regular visitor to the bandstand and river
areas, as well as the allotments as I am very
interested in the allotments. This is one of
the best allotment sites. Of course I have
also been to the Farmers' Market.
I
was invited to the Duke of Devonshire's visit,
at which we discussed the area, and I also
have close contact with the Friends of Dukes
Meadows and I keep updated on their developments.
Their work is invaluable and very much appreciated
locally.
Back
to top
11.
What lobbying is the Council currently doing
to persuade London Underground to stop at Turnham
Green?
We
are currently not lobbying for the Piccadilly
Line to stop at Turnham Green. Although it
is part of the current Transport Strategy I
think that there would be little to gain until
the Tube has been transferred to the Mayor
for London. I don't think it would be a wise
use of what are scarce staff resources to lobby
at the moment. However when the transfer has
happened we will be working with, and for,
local residents and groups to resume lobby
strongly. I understand the Mayor has already
made some comment about the need to review
when he gets it within his control, which is
welcome news.
Back
to top
12.
How do you reassure Chiswick residents that
their views will be adequately represented
on an Executive on which no members are from
local wards or even live or work in this area?
Well,
there is a good argument here for me saying
that you voted in the wrong party, but I would
say that wouldn't I!
In
all seriousness though, the fact that 9 Conservative
Councillors represent Chiswick shouldn't, and
doesn't, stop cross party links and procedures
- and I do have an open door to all borough
councillors, regardless of party.
To
illustrate this, we have been working closely
with Luke Kirton, of the AbeeC party, on the
urgent issues of Brentford Football Ground
and we have recently been able to announce
some progress.
Also,
the executive works for the whole borough regardless
of the ward we represent, and we try to keep
abreast of local issues as much as possible.
Back
to top
13.
Will we have Christmas lights in Chiswick this
year?
That
all depends on the willingness or ability for
the local area committee and local traders
to put funds forward for Christmas lights,
in the same way as the other areas in Hounslow
do. In Hounslow centre the area committee put
money into a scheme for Diwali and Christmas.
I
have also had some initial discussions with
an advertising organisation who suggested that
they could put lights on Chiswick High Road,
as part of a project across the borough. There
could be other ways to fund lights and these
are being explored.
Back
to top
14.
When will the underside of the railway bridge
on Turnham Green Terrace be cleaned?
Last year, Wandsworth Council won an important
case against Railtrack, resulting in Railtrack
being ordered to pay for the removal of pigeon
fouling beneath a bridge in Wandsworth, and
pay for the erection of netting to the bridge
to prevent further pigeon activity. This was
an important result for us because both Railtrack
and London Underground Ltd had consistently
denied that they are responsible for such problems
on bridges, and that local authorities are
responsible..
However, I understand that the ruling appears
to have been dependent upon the scale of the
problem and the cost of the remedial works
for the one particular bridge in question (in
Balham), both of which are far and above that
found on the bridge at Turnham Green Terrace.
Our legal department and written to LU twice
since the outcome of the court case but have
not yet received a reply, but we will continue
to follow this issue up with LU and Railtrack,
or their successor.
In
the past the underside of the bridge has been
"proofed" against pigeons but I believe
that, in one or two areas, this proofing has
failed or been removed. As a result there is
some fouling beneath the bridge but not a level
sufficient to warrant expensive formal action
against London Underground, which might fail
due to the amounts concerned.
We will continue to lobby London Underground
to improve the conditions under the bridge
and I have asked our Street Cleansing service
to ensure that they clean the pavements beneath
the bridge regularly.
Back
to top
Hounslow
Council Leader Steps Down
See
the local
government section of the site for details
of the election results and comments.
|