The MacGuffin of the Burlington Lane Reopening |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chiswick Riverside councillor Gabriella Giles reports back
April 17, 2023 Scrutiny and Street Closures In film, television and literature, the MacGuffin is a mechanism for telling a story...think the search for the holy grail in Arthurian legends, or in Monty Python, or in Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade. Reflecting on Tuesday’s meeting of the council’s Overview and Scrutiny Committee (OSC) I can’t help but think that the decision to create a school street at Burlington Lane was simply a MacGuffin. To recap:
Thanks to the eagle-eyed Cllr John Todd, the Conservative group in Chiswick started work on understanding if the officer's decision was actually legal. Apart from the fact that we had less than one working day to review and comment, it was apparent that there was a rush on this decision to get it in before the publication date of 28th February. The timing of this is all a little tricky, as 28th February was also the day of the council’s budget setting meeting. So why the reference to a MacGuffin? It's because, to me, it never made sense to implement a school street on Burlington Lane, when this didn’t work on Staveley Road. It never made sense to implement a school street while the other measures from the A316 didn’t operate in tandem, and while the barrier at Staveley Road is still in place and the hours and days don't reflect a school street. It's a MacGuffin. So what is it that residents want? A scheme that works in conjunction with all the measures in Grove Park and Strand-on the-Green, where traffic doesn't thunder down a lane instead of a road. A scheme that is simple to understand that allows for visitor access. And preferably a full review of all these measures and proper consultation. To replace a barrier with a scheme that would only have camera enforcement between the hours of 8am-9am, and 2.45pm - 3.45pm, Monday - Friday during school term time, knowing that the peak traffic hours prior to 2020 did not align, and that it would still mean free access into Grove Park, seemed like a cop-out. And to make it permanent without the chance for residents to then comment in consultation seemed a misstep. Or was it? The council has provided me (via a freedom of information (FOI) request) with the costs for implementing the various measures in the project, as follows:
I do not have a breakdown of the consultation, data collection, consultant or public meeting costs by each measure, but the costs to date are as follows: Total cost of data collection: £66.570.86 Total cost of consultancy services (excluding consultancy services used under the Streetspace programme): £26,005.40 Total cost of consultations: £21,244.40 Having received this information, it’s left me with more questions than answers, but I have to wonder why the implementation of school streets are so much higher than the camera on Hartington Road. But that is a discussion for another day. To go back to Tuesday’s meeting, and why I think the COD was a MacGuffin, it was pretty interesting to watch. Apart from the chair’s fumbling over words, repeatedly calling John Todd "Cllr Toad" and mispronouncing Staveley, there was an obvious pre-determined list of questions as, when one committee member failed to appear, the chair was left searching for another member to ask the questions assigned to the absent councillor. You can see for yourself the confusion in the running order, and Cllr Jo Biddolph repeatedly reminding the chair about what was expected. It was clear the others were equally concerned. Having looked at the report from Tuesday’s meeting, which now goes to cabinet, it was interesting to see what was included in the minutes, and what wasn't. Ultimately, the recommendations in the initial COD will never work without a full review of all the other measures in Grove Park and Strand-on-the-Green, so if the council is going to mitigate through-traffic from the A316, what other choice do they have at this time? I’ll leave it to you to decide whether this is a MacGuffin. I’d like to think not. Other Traffic News for Grove Park Work on the A316 Great Chertsey Road at Grove Park Bridge is due to begin on 21 April 2023. If you’re unsure where this is, I’ve marked it on the map: It’s the part of the A316 that crosses over the railway line between Hartington and Staveley Roads. Much like when repairs took place on the A4, there will be works over a 24-hour period. And on Friday, we were advised by Hounslow’s Traffic department that they will be lifting “the access restrictions on Staveley Road, Hartington Road and on Thames Road / Strand-on-the-Green". These dates are currently:
And with all that, I wish you a good week! Councillor Gabriella Giles Chiswick Riverside Gabriella.giles@hounslow.gov.uk 07966 270823 DATES FOR YOUR DIARY Tuesday, 18th April at 7:00pm: Cabinet Tuesday 9th May at 7:00pm: Overview and Scrutiny Tuesday, 23rd May at 7.30pm Borough Council AGM CONSERVATIVE COUNCILLOR SURGERIES Chiswick: Every Saturday from 9.30am to 10.30am at Chiswick Library (the eight Conservative councillors take this surgery in turn). Gunnersbury: First Saturday of the month from 10am to 11am at The Gunnersbury Triangle Club, Triangle Way, off The Ridgeway, W3 8LU (at least one of the Chiswick Gunnersbury ward councillors takes this surgery). CONSERVATIVE COUNCILLORS and CONTACTS Chiswick Gunnersbury (was Turnham Green) ward Cllr Joanna Biddolph joanna.biddolph@hounslow.gov.uk 07976 703446 Cllr Ranjit Gill ranjit.gill@hounslow.gov.uk 07976 702956 Cllr Ron Mushiso ron.mushiso@hounslow.gov.uk 07976 702887 Chiswick Homefields ward Cllr Jack Emsley jack.emsley@hounslow.gov.uk 07977 396017 Cllr Gerald McGregor gerald.mcgregor@hounslow.gov.uk 07866 784821 Cllr John Todd john.todd@hounslow.gov.uk 07866 784651 Chiswick Riverside ward Cllr Peter Thompson peter.thompson@hounslow.gov.uk 07977 395810 Cllr Gabriella Giles gabriella.giles@hounslow.gov.uk 07966 270823
|