Lib Dem 'Call In' of Fisher's Lane Closure Rejected
Opposition councillors point to flaws in equalities assessment process
Cllr Gary Malcolm participates in the council meeting on Zoom
‘Call In’ of Fisher’s Lane Closure Rejected
Opposition councillors point to flaws in equalities assessment process
An Ealing Council committee has voted to continue with the access restrictions on Fisher’s Line despite opposition councillors identifying flaws in the Equalities Analysis Assessment (EAA) relating to the measure.
Liberal Democrat councillors ‘called in’ the decision for review but the Labour councillors supported a continuation of the closure and the committee voted by 11 to 2 at a virtual meeting not to suspend the scheme.
Evidence was presented to the committee that the EAA was not individually created for the report on the measure but copy and pasted from a January Cabinet decision about LTNs. The Liberal Democrats argued that this invalidated the decision and a council officer at the meeting admitted using a non-specific text was a mistake. Another committee member call it as regrettable.
An EAA could have made it possible to include exemptions for those who are disabled based up on where people live.
The opposition have also claimed that there are few details as yet on the promised consultation on the scheme. The Liberal Democrats say their own survey shows that there is over 70% opposition to the closure in Southfield ward.
Southfield war Councillor Gary Malcolm said, “After nine months people have not been won over with the Fisher Lane changes and are reporting big delays to their journeys and many people need to use vehicles for their jobs. It is a disgrace that things are allowed to proceed when clearly an important document about disabilities was a cut and paste job from a January meeting. I cycle and if the Council wants to get more people to cycle it needs to win people over rather than introduce a draconian scheme like this without any consultation.”
Like Reading Articles Like This? Help Us Produce More This site remains committed to providing local community news and public interest journalism. Articles such as the one above are integral to what we do. We aim to feature as much as possible on local societies, charities based in the area, fundraising efforts by residents, community-based initiatives and even helping people find missing pets. We’ve always done that and won’t be changing, in fact we’d like to do more. However, the readership that these stories generates is often below that needed to cover the cost of producing them. Our financial resources are limited and the local media environment is intensely competitive so there is a constraint on what we can do. We are therefore asking our readers to consider offering financial support to these efforts. Any money given will help support community and public interest news and the expansion of our coverage in this area. A suggested monthly payment is £8 but we would be grateful for any amount for instance if you think this site offers the equivalent value of a subscription to a daily printed newspaper you may wish to consider £20 per month. If neither of these amounts is suitable for you then contact info@neighbournet.com and we can set up an alternative. All payments are made through a secure web site. One-off donations are also appreciated. Choose The Amount You Wish To Contribute. If you do support us in this way we’d be interested to hear what kind of articles you would like to see more of on the site – send your suggestions to the editor. For businesses we offer the chance to be a corporate sponsor of community content on the site. For £30 plus VAT per month you will be the designated sponsor of at least one article a month with your logo appearing if supplied. If there is a specific community group or initiative you’d like to support we can make sure your sponsorship is featured on related content for a one off payment of £50 plus VAT. All payments are made through a secure web site. |
April 11, 2021
