FIGURES
SHOW CHISWICK CONTRIBUTING £2 MILLION
A YEAR TO HOUNSLOW'S PARKING FUND
Parking
Charges Mean Chiswick Residents "more
taxed than any other Londoners and possibly
pay the highest level of local tax in the country"
The
issue of parking charges looks
set to be the topic of lively
debate as figures released by
the Council show that Chiswick
is paying over £2 million
a year in parking charges. The
figures will be seized on by
those arguing that Chiswick
is a "cash-cow" for
the rest of the borough.
One
local resident claimed that
the numbers meant that Chiswick
residents paid more tax than
any other residents in London,
"the parking charges
represent over £100 extra
per Chiswick household which
you should add to the Council
Tax. This means that Chiswick
residents are more taxed than
any other Londoners and possibly
pay the highest level of local
tax in the country."
|
|
|
The
total revenue received by the Council from
parking is £3.3 million with over two
thirds of that coming from Chiswick. Taking
the total from CPZ schemes in the borough then
Chiswick accounts for more than 75% of the
revenue. As many of the schemes in other parts
of the borough are smaller and more dispersed
the likelihood is that the Chiswick schemes
are much more profitable suggesting that over
80% of the parking surplus comes from this
area.
The
figures are bound to renew controversy over
differential parking charges. Chiswick pays
double the rate that applies in the west of
the borough and many see this as politically
motivated with only one member of the ruling
Labour group representing a Chiswick ward affected
by parking charges. The rationale for the differential
pricing is the "generally better"
transport links and the high level of demand
for parking permits. This seems difficult to
justify given the current state of transport
in the Chiswick area compared to Hounslow Town
which has the lowest charge. Twice as many
mainline trains serve Hounslow station and
it is served by the Piccadilly line which has
a time-tabled peak service operation of a train
every five minutes as opposed to every 8 minutes
for the District line at Turnham Green (and
12 minutes for Chiswick Park and Gunnersbury).
Each
year a budget is set for the amount of surplus
from parking which is to be used for Highways
Maintenance. If the actual surplus is greater
than this then the extra money is transferred
to th Parking Reserve Account at the end of
the year.
The
use of the funds is also bound to stoke controversy.
For the current financial year £1.2 million
is to go to general highway improvement. There
is some scepticism that Chiswick gets its fair
share of this and many road schemes that local
people are lobbying for remain unfunded. Road
crossings at Cavendish School and Sutton Court
Road enjoy massive local support but no money
has yet been allocated for their implementation.
A
further £465,000 surplus from parking
is allocated to the Parking Reserve Account
which is distributed at the discretion of the
Committee of the Council with none of this
money being allocated to Chiswick specific
projects. Much of it goes towards paying for
concessionary bus passes but this year £60,000
has been given to consultants to investigate
the possibility of a tram link and money has
also gone towards CCTV projects, obviously
not in Chiswick.
The
Council have said that the tram link plan will
aim to link Chiswick to Heathrow but many people
feel that it is highly unlikely that trams
could run this far east and that the Council
is only mentioning Chiswick in the context
of this project to justify using mainly Chiswick
sourced revenue for the study which will inevitably
recommend a terminus well short of this area.
There
are also likely to be some misgivings about
the Council's refusal to fund the implementation
of new local parking schemes such as the West
Chiswick CPZ out of existing parking surpluses.
They are planning to use Section 106 monies
(funds paid by developers as part of the condition
of getting planning consent) to pay for future
Chiswick schemes. Some money from the development
of Chiswick Park is likely to be used this
way but many claim these funds, which were
originally supposed to build a new tube station
in the area, should not be used on something
which is essentially a revenue raising project
which will result in more pressure on an already
stretched public transport system.
A
full report of CPZ revenue is to he present
to a joint meeting of the planning and monitoring
committees at 7.30pm on Tuesday 26th February
at 7.30pm at the Catholic Centre on Dukes Avenue.
The public are welcome to attend.
Parking
to be focus of special meeting - 26th February
Detailed
Report to be considered at the meeting
Parking
Permits in Chiswick
|